The Ghost and the Darkness is based on a true story.
Throughout history, there have been many famous hunting stories. Perhaps none are crazier than the one shown in the movie "The Ghost and the Darkness." The film chronicles the lions of Tsavo, two man eating big cats that terrorized a construction project building a railway bridge over a river in Kenya back in 1898.
The two maneless male lions are rumored to have killed and eaten 135 workers before the project's lead, Colonel John Henry Patterson shot and killed both animals. He later wrote a best-selling book chronicling the event called "The Man-Eaters of Tsavo." This book was subsequently turned into a film.
As you have probably already guessed, the film takes quite a few liberties with the real story of what happened with these lion attacks in East Africa. Most notably the introduction of a completely fictional character, but we'll get into that. Here is a little about the film and the events that inspired it.
The Ghost and the Darkness was written by William Goldman, famous for writing "All the President's Men," "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid," and "The Princess Bride." The screenplay was only loosely based on Col. John Henry Patterson's written accounts of the attacks. Goldman took quite a few liberties with the real events, the most notable being the addition of the "great white hunter" character Charles Remington.
The film was directed by Stephen Hopkins, who was a second unit director on the 1986 hit "Highlander" before going on to direct "A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child," and "Predator 2" before working on this African adventure. When it came to the cast, a variety of actors were considered for the roles of Patterson and Remington. Paramount Pictures wanted Tom Cruise for Patterson, who in retrospective, seems like a poor fit to us. Cruise turned the role down. Kevin Costner was also interested in the role, but that fell through. Nicholas Cage and John Travolta were also considered. We can't see them doing this role either. Eventually, Val Kilmer showed a true interest and passion for the historic character and was brought on for the role.
The Remington character also saw a few different actors considered including Anthony Hopkins, Robert De Niro, and Sean Connery. Around the same time, Michael Douglas came on as a producer of the film and ultimately decided he would take on the big game hunter role. Both the Goldman and Hopkins have since come forward saying they weren't happy with this decision. The film then cast John Kani for the role of Samuel, Tom Wilkinson as Sir Robert Beaumont, Emily Mortimer as Patterson's wife, Brian McCardie as Angus Starling, Bernard Hill Dr. David Hawthorne as Om Puri as Abdullah and Henry Cele as Mahina. Production then headed for South Africa.
Filming took nearly four months and according to Hopkins, "was a true nightmare." The production struggled with the harsh conditions of the African bush in the Songimvelo Game Reserve. Crew members were bitten by snakes and other creatures. Storms slowed the filming and it didn't help that Val Kilmer came onto the production on short notice and had a little time to prepare for the role. Still, the production worked nearly seven days a week for four months straight to get the film finished. Tame lions from a zoo were used for most of the shots. The movie employed hundreds of extras to portray the construction workers and Masai warriors that take part in the lion hunt later in the film.
After editing and scoring by famous composer Jerry Goldsmith, the film was eventually released to theaters on October 11, 1996 where it was profitable, bringing in $75 million on a $55 million budget. Critically, the film didn't fare as well. Kilmer was nominated for a Razzie award and reviews to this day remain mixed. Famous film critic Roger Ebert roasted the film's editing, writing and characters, closing out his review by stating:
"I hope someone made a documentary about the making of "The Ghost and the Darkness." Now that would be a movie worth seeing."
Despite what the critics thought, the film has a wide cult following and seems better received today. Especially with hunters who praise it at as being one of the most realistic depictions of hunting ever put on the silver screen.
The real story behind Tsavo.
As you probably already guessed, the truth was stretched quite a bit for dramatic effect. The Remington character was a complete fabrication. The lions didn't have manes, and the den of these maneaters wasn't filled with human bones. It also wasn't found by Patterson until long after both animals had been shot.
Patterson was a Lieutenant-Colonel with the British Army when the Uganda Railway committee brought him on to oversee the bridge project in 1898. The bridge was meant to link up then Uganda with a major harbor and the Tsavo River was a major obstacle. Patterson had only been on his new job for a few days when the lions began attacking and killing the Indian workers, often snatching them right out of their tents at night. And you thought you had a rough start to a job before. In his book, Patterson described how the attacks started small, but the animals became bolder as time went on.
"At first they were not always successful in their efforts to carry off a victim, but as time went on they stopped at nothing and indeed braved any danger in order to obtain their favorite food," Patterson wrote in his book. "Their methods then became so uncanny, and their man-stalking so well-timed and so certain of success, that the workmen firmly believed they were not real animals at all, but devils in lion's shape."
As the lions continued to pick people off one by one, the workers became understandably terrified and many of them began to flee after attempts at building fences and even large fires failed to keep the animals from attacking. Meanwhile, the British became upset that the project was being slowed and Patterson decided he must take matters into his own hands.
The first lion is killed.
On December 9, 1898, the lions attempted to snatch a worker near the riverbank. When that failed, they ended up killing a donkey instead and were feasting on it on location. Patterson responded to the scene with a borrowed rifle he was unfamiliar with. Patterson's gun failed and he only managed to wound the animal. However, the lions had only partially consumed the donkey.
Figuring the lions might want to return for their kill, Patterson constructed a machan platform and had what was left of the donkey lashed to a nearby tree. The lions returned that evening, but instead of coming into the bait, they circled Patterson's position for nearly two hours, growling in the darkness. In the movie, Kilmer's character is knocked from the platform by a wayward owl before he kills the lion. While Patterson did say an owl flew into his head during this hunt, it did not knock him to the ground.
Eventually, he spotted the shape of one of the lions in the darkness and took a shot that hit. He then decided to unload in the general direction he heard the animal. It ended up being unnecessary as the first shot had pierced the heart, killing the nine-foot animal. It resulted in a short period of relief and celebration for the workers.
The second lion.
Even though Patterson had killed one maneater, the second lion was undeterred in his quest for human victims and soon made a failed attempt to kill one of the project's inspectors in his hut. Patterson set up a similar sting operation to what had worked before using a dead goat as bait, but once again, only managed to wound the animal. The lion made no further attempts at attacking for ten days, making Patterson and the workers hopeful it had simply gone off and died in the bush.
However, the lion made a recovery and attempted an attack inside the camp again on December 27, 1898. Patterson set up another platform in a tree and did a stake out with another man as backup. After a long wait, they soon realized the lion was stalking them. Patterson let the lion close the gap to only 20 yards before hitting him with a .303 round to the chest. In his book, he described the frightening encounter.
"I heard the bullet strike him, but unfortunately it had no knock-down effect, for with a fierce growl he turned and made off with great long bounds. Before he disappeared from sight, however, I managed to have three more shots at him from the magazine rifle, and another growl told me that the last of these had also taken effect," Patterson wrote.
Patterson set out with trackers the next morning and trailed the lion when it suddenly charged out of the bush. Patterson fired a few more times, knocking the animal down, but it was still undeterred. In his book, Patterson says he was only able to escape to the safety of a tree because one of the shots had broken the lion's foot. He was then able to get one last shot off that finally ended the animal's reign of terror. In all, they found the lion had been hit six times including the shot Patterson took 10 days prior before the animal finally died from his wounds.
With the lions gone, work was able to resume as normal and the crews eventually completed the bridge in February of 1899. Patterson ended up keeping the skins and skulls of the two lions. He used them as rugs for years before selling them to Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago. Patterson made out well on this deal, receiving $5,000 for the animals, which was a lot of money for 1924. After Tsavo, Patterson went on to be involved in the Second Boer War and World War I. He lived out his later years in San Diego, California with his wife, where he died in 1947 at the age of 79.
The Field Museum completely restored the hides of the Tsavo maneaters and put them on permanent display with their skulls. Scientists were also able to do some scientific analysis on the skulls in recent years and some scientists are now convinced the number of victims may have been exaggerated by Patterson. Which may have made sense for a guy trying to sell his book.
After analyzing the teeth and chemical levels within, they now believe the real body count for these two animals may have been closer to 35. They have also determined that the animals were likely not feeding on humans exclusively. Many people wanted to know why the big cats resorted to humans as prey. One common theory that seems supported by other maneater cases is an animal with damaged teeth. At least one study has shown that one lion had an infected tooth that likely made capturing its usual prey more difficult.
Other theories are that the developed a taste for humans scavenging human remains or that natural prey in the area were devastated due to disease in the years prior. Whatever the case may be, the story of the Tsavo man-eaters remains one of the most famous cases of man-eating big cats in human history and will likely be hotly debated for many years to come.